The question as to why our society should take the sale of a six pack more seriously than the franchise is one of those questions I can't get anyone to answer. Show your ID to the beer barn, but in the name of some nebulous "disparate impact", one doesn't. It's quite telling that a plastic display of maturity to get loaded is demanded, but the cool sobriety that democracy supposedly demands its "citizens" is some kind of tyranny.
Remember this inspiring image?
You need an ID to get beer, to qualify for EBT, for welfare, for WIC, to drive, for a plethora of cradle to grave social functions. Why is voting supposed to be an exception to this?
When you vote, you do so because you are presumend to have skin in the game with your polity. Your polity, in case the voting chaos advocates havent gotten the memo, is a series of concentric circles, not just a presidential election-the largest circle. Your state and its many offices, your congressional district, you county, your town, and your city or county districts.
Have these voting chaos advocates ever considered how many of the offices one casts a ballot for hinge on a few hundred, or even few dozen votes? Do people really want to turn an election into a series of competing rent-a-blocs in corrupt districts?
Yeah, there's that word, corruption. Does anyone think that an abandonment of standards will not invite the kinds of voting abuse that happens in countries that we police to ensure "fair and peaceful elections"?